Gigabyte GA-MA785GMT-UD2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA785GMT-UD2H  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20090916
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 16 '19 at 14:07
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Memory 32.2
1-Core 11
2-Core 20.3
16% 21.2 Pts
4-Core 28.1
8-Core 38.2
4% 33.2 Pts
64-Core 38.1
2% 38.1 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 1TB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 83 47 25 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 86
Write 73.2
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 59.8
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 117%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
342GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 103 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 38.4
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 103
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST4000DM005-2DP1 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 125 120 138 148 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 112
Write 101
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 129
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 96%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
853GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 63 60 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 86.2
Write 74
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 60.2
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
463GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 83 93 92 89 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 75.5
Write 84
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 90
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 59%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
10GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 20 21 22 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 21
Write 20.5
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 20.8
28% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.98% Terrible
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.98%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA785GMT-UD2H Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA785GMT-UD2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback