Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-E R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '19 at 07:50
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 409
59% 434 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KSS120 120GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T180
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 37 24 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 358
Write 39
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 34.6
27% 125 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 16.3
73% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 86.5
DQ Write 35.6
DQ Mixed 54.1
42% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST3160811AS 160GB-$45
77GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 61
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 41.2
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FL2400D4U17-8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 11.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0 Builds (Compare 6,446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback