Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory63.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 11:09
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 183
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 801
72% 606 Pts
64-Core 2,082
129% 2,082 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 8.88
Parallax 7.12
7% 8.34 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 9.57
7% 8.26 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 64GB-$48
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225G
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,698
Write 2,788
Mixed 2,690
610% 2,725 MB/s
4K Read 458
4K Write 353
4K Mixed 380
1,369% 397 MB/s
DQ Read 1,382
DQ Write 1,101
DQ Mixed 1,204
912% 1,229 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 77%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 18 17 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
9.2% Terrible
Read 30.3
Write 13.4
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 17.3
20% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 57.1
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 44.5
135% 47.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 116%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback