HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Z6 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C6
Memory85.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 04:47
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4116
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 162
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 608
54% 459 Pts
64-Core 1,210
75% 1,210 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P6000
Nvidia(10DE 11A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1657 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 168
Parallax 182
109% 161 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 179
Splatting 114
110% 136 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 835 626 558 436 404 369 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1680
Write 1,383
Mixed 847
SusWrite 538
248% 1,112 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 58.2
198% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 666
DQ Write 548
DQ Mixed 628
465% 614 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 188%
Great: 259%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
263GB free
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 643 649 647 645 644 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,662
Write 1,494
Mixed 898
SusWrite 683
264% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 53.6
195% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 677
DQ Mixed 731
547% 729 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 200%
Great: 259%
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
217GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 546 256 257 259 257 259 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 708
Write 793
Mixed 718
SusWrite 306
142% 631 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 37.3
138% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 693
DQ Write 582
DQ Mixed 583
452% 619 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 118%
Great: 141%
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
22GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 803
Write 810
Mixed 746
176% 786 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 44
146% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 556
DQ Mixed 582
446% 606 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 141%
G-raid with Thunderbolt 12TB
9TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 370 374 366 368 367 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 347
Write 351
Mixed 106
SusWrite 369
212% 293 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.4
307% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 205%
Great: 207%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 99 102 106 106 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 100
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 103
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
180% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 69%
External RAID 6TB
1.5TB free, PID ce34
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 37 39 40 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 41.2
Write 41
Mixed 41
SusWrite 38.1
55% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1 HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1 HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 95GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 32767, 8192, 8192, 32767, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
128% Outstanding
MC Read 53.9
MC Write 50.2
MC Mixed 54.4
151% 52.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 128%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback