Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 480 16,023 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	44% Average	Memory 64.7 1-Core 71.5 2-Core 124 52% 86.6 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 169 19% 150 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0487) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.85 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.71 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.09 1% 0.88 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 32 41 36 51 58 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 65.7 Write 53 Mixed 46 SusWrite 43 38% 51.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 47%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 3,362 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 25GB free, PID 00ee Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 2.3 3.3 4.1 3.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	2.2% Terrible	Read 4.2 Write 0.2 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 3.6 3% 2.62 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.2% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG GU672203EP0200 3GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 8.9 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	196x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	23x
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	19x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	10x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158