Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130815
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '19 at 01:06
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 110 2-Core 215 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 565 61% 487 Pts	64-Core 549 34% 549 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 119 Parallax 101 92% 111 fps	MRender 99.6 Gravity 104 Splatting 107 85% 103 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 180GB 4,011 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 138 128 133 173 153 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	70% Very good	Read 324 Write 208 Mixed 181 SusWrite 145 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 37 123% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 111 112% 183 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 82%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 56GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 316 312 317 318 316 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 464 Mixed 368 SusWrite 331 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 59.8 194% 68.7 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 352 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 230GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 130 131 132 133 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 139 Write 118 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 132 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TX2133KLH-16GK 2x8GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.1 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 19.6 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	196x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	128x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	76x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16