Asus X79-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X79-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160202
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '19 at 19:20
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$109 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Memory 95.3 1-Core 116 2-Core 226 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 706 70% 573 Pts	64-Core 870 54% 870 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% EVGA(3842 2884) 3GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53% Above average	Lighting 64.6 Reflection 65.4 Parallax 84.4 53% 71.5 fps	MRender 78.6 Gravity 74.1 Splatting 50.3 54% 67.7 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,757 Write 5,394 Mixed 369 567% 2,507 MB/s	4K Read 190 4K Write 466 4K Mixed 32.2 575% 229 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 905 DQ Mixed 1,144 726% 802 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 145 147 148 146 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Read 154 Write 152 Mixed 99.8 SusWrite 147 102% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 101%
WD Elements 1.5TB 5,064 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 29 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 27.5 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 28.3 38% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 992071 (997071) 2x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	63% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 20.8 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 14 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 56.1 71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79-DELUXE Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 96%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 84%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X79-DELUXE - $229

CPU
Core i7-4930KIntel $109Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	238x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	97x
Core i7-4960XIntel $1,189Bench 78%, 5,121 samples	66x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	30x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	26x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	15x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 5,910 samples	21x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	17x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $899

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16