Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics63.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '19 at 03:32
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 178
60% 132 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 767
68% 575 Pts
64-Core 1,219
76% 1,219 Pts
Poor: 76% Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 376A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.8% Good
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 81.8
Parallax 114
45% 83.8 fps
MRender 81.5
Gravity 150
Splatting 129
100% 120 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 237 259 246 248 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 333
Write 297
Mixed 212
SusWrite 249
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 20.6
70% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 176
142% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 129%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
114GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 565 554 575 543 526 516 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,323
Write 700
Mixed 476
SusWrite 546
168% 761 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 32.1
102% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 1,085
DQ Mixed 771
678% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 168%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 750GB-$55
426GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 117 117 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 110
Write 107
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 116
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
71.5% Very good
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 26.4
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 3.5
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 583
7% 583 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,041
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback