Eurocom W860CU Cougar

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemEurocom W860CU Cougar  (all builds)
MotherboardEUROCOM W860CU Cougar
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '19 at 23:14
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 820-$119
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 136
60% 97 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 250
29% 226 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Clevo(1558 8687) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.61% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 10.8
10% 10.9 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 9.4
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.79 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.61%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 50 58 59 57 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.9% Below average
Read 241
Write 111
Mixed 193
SusWrite 65.3
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 15.6
56% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 135
114% 165 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905469-107.A00LF 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 10.6
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback