Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateAug 20 '16 at 18:18
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 137
59% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 366
38% 303 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8581) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.4% Poor
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 28
Parallax 25.2
23% 27.3 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 26.6
23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 960GB-$195
747GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 492
Write 323
Mixed 333
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 10.4
73% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 99.7
DQ Mixed 48.4
58% 104 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 121
Write 126
Mixed 123
93% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.29
113% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
481GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 101
Mixed 98.2
74% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.29
110% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
366GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 90
Mixed 85
66% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.22
87% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
100GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 114
Write 115
Mixed 112
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.17
82% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 84%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 126GB
100GB free, PID 00b2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 31
Write 19.4
Mixed 22.7
29% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.68
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 1.69
147% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback