MSI Z77A-GD55 (MS-7751)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7751
MotherboardMSI Z77A-GD55 (MS-7751)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120717
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '19 at 23:39
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 590
64% 506 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Gigabyte(1458 3628) 3GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 72.1
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 89.5
59% 76.7 fps
MRender 81.6
Gravity 81.3
Splatting 52.7
57% 71.9 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 395 223 152 153 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 487
Mixed 404
SusWrite 246
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 42.3
162% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 280
210% 277 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145
452GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 77.5
Write 76
Mixed 49
SusWrite 76.9
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
100GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 104 105 102 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 118
Write 120
Mixed 63
SusWrite 103
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 70%
takeMS colorline 1GB
1GB free, PID 6025
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.54% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 4
SusWrite 3.2
6% 5.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2133C9-4GAB 04CD F3-17000CL9-4GBXM 04CD F3-2133C9-4GAB 04CD F3-17000CL9-4GBXM 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 24.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 22.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77A-GD55 (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-GD55 (MS-7751)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback