Asus StrikerExtreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus StrikerExtreme  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '19 at 11:45
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 37.1
2-Core 75.7
44% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 150
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 42.5
33% 38.5 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 38.1
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.8% Poor
Read 217
Write 36.8
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 37.1
19% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4
35% 8.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
465GB free
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 81 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 81.7
Write 76.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 80.9
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 69%
WD My Book ES 640GB
396GB free
Firmware: 012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 73 53 64 67 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 78.8
Write 42.2
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 59.3
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical StrikerExtreme Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus StrikerExtreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $57
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback