Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-HD2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170407
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateMar 12 '19 at 03:36
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 122
52% 85.5 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 200
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Lighting 9.33
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 11.9
8% 11 fps
MRender 8.43
Gravity 8.57
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
888GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 155 163 164 156 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 174
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 161
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
153GB free
Firmware: 0001YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 97 99 100 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 97.5
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 98.2
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 11.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 9.2
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-HD2-CF Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback