Medion D54250WYB-IS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 68% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMedion D54250WYB-IS  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION D54250WYB-IS
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140827
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 10 '19 at 19:01
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 68%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4250U-$499
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 84.8
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 116
58% 92 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 182
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2054) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 5.63
Reflection 6.23
Parallax 8.69
5% 6.85 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 10.7
6% 6.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BW120A3L 120GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 138 136 137 139 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 331
Write 152
Mixed 198
SusWrite 135
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 28.4
113% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 182
137% 183 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 80%
Crucial M550 mSATA 128GB-$378
84GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 348 344 346 348 348 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 415
Write 351
Mixed 305
SusWrite 344
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 32.3
126% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 219
190% 281 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1315 CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 17.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback