Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3.99GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.99GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 3 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.1% Average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 34.8 2-Core 67.4 36% 54.3 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 234 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 61%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 129GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 104 103 105 106 104 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.4% Poor	Read 220 Write 93.7 Mixed 106 SusWrite 105 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 8.5 30% 8.77 MB/s	DQ Read 99.1 DQ Write 80.9 DQ Mixed 83 64% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x3GB 511 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 1 slots used 3GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 44 102% 35.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples	16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples	14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	6x

SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples	53x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples	5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16