Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130503
Uptime	8.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '19 at 09:23
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 66.3 2-Core 128 59% 93.8 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 308 43% 316 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 8520) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	35.2% Below average	Lighting 45.5 Reflection 44.6 Parallax 39.4 37% 43.2 fps	MRender 40.6 Gravity 40.7 Splatting 36.1 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.r Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 162 Write 260 Mixed 227 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 27.2 94% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.1 DQ Write 60.5 19% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 111%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 351GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 88 91 93 91 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 40.5 Write 29 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 75.9 40% 52.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 76%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 110GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 73 109 109 112 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 100 Write 47 Mixed 67 SusWrite 82.3 55% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 9905471-001.A01LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 20GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.3% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 13.6 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 11.6 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	70x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	38x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	34x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	38x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 20,728 samples	8x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	6x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 3x2GBSamsungBench 33%, 184 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369