Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99M Killer/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '19 at 01:44
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 1,588 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 82.1 2-Core 164 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 322 43% 322 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% EVGA(3842 2966) CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Lighting 49.3 Reflection 46.2 Parallax 41.2 40% 45.5 fps	MRender 39.5 Gravity 42.6 Splatting 37.4 32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LM960HCHP-0E003 960GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 460GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXT3003Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 413 420 420 416 417 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 448 Mixed 345 SusWrite 416 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 91.8 4K Mixed 40.1 144% 53.6 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 314 244% 334 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 115%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 58GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 41 32 32 30 33 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 145 Write 102 Mixed 108 SusWrite 43.4 126% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.4 216% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x4GB 300 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.9% Above average	MC Read 24 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 20 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.7 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	24x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	14x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	11x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	10x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $67Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x
NVME SSD 256GBNetacBench 178%, 1,034 samples	4x
750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GBIntel $550Bench 186%, 8,641 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $117Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	7x
HyperX DDR4 2800 C14 4x4GBKingstonBench 91%, 1,174 samples	5x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $569

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16