ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4158FW8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 4158FW8 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	34.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140114
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '19 at 12:46
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5640 538 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1366-pin LGA, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 62.2 1-Core 54.6 2-Core 113 46% 76.5 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 373 37% 300 Pts	64-Core 862 53% 862 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB 6,863 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 515GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.05G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 52 52 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 150 Write 51.8 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 51.9 58% 78.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 80%
WD My Passport 25EA 2TB 555 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 25ea Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 94 92 93 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 109 Write 101 Mixed 46.1 SusWrite 93.2 115% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B1K70DH0-YH9 6x8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 6 of 12 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	49.2% Average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 20.4 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback