Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '16 at 00:33
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 152
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 486
48% 393 Pts
64-Core 1,119
69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 121
Parallax 102
90% 111 fps
MRender 99.8
Gravity 102
Splatting 105
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 443
Write 84.3
Mixed 147
48% 225 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 10.2
62% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 89.1
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 8.43
29% 63.3 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 118%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
112GB free
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
68% Good
Read 498
Write 162
Mixed 187
61% 282 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 15.2
104% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 59.5
79% 145 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68%
Great: 88%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
563GB free
Firmware: 1D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 113
Write 91.5
Mixed 97
76% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.48
143% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965426-079.A00 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.5% Excellent
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 29.4
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback