Notebook W65KJ1_KK1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Notebook W65KJ1_KK1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook W65KJ1_KK1
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170724
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '19 at 23:15
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500T 5,419 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 201 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 375 48% 360 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Clevo(1558 651A) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1935 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Lighting 44 Reflection 33.3 Parallax 44.3 36% 40.5 fps	MRender 46.3 Gravity 42.7 Splatting 38.1 34% 42.4 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
TRO-2280-128-PRO 128GB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0628A SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 38 38 39 33 38 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 55%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55 30,952 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 268GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 86 86 81 86 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 88.5 Write 78.7 Mixed 45.7 SusWrite 85.1 55% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 4,823 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	77.9% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 23.5 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 24.3 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical W65KJ1_KK1 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65KJ1_KK1

CPU
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	14x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	13x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	10x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	25x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	23x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	7x

SSD
SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TBNvmeBench 216%, 294 samples	5x
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 2,542 samples	5x
850 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 102%, 28,058 samples	4x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	7x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFRA266.C8FD1 16GBSamsungBench 72%, 18 samples	6x
KCRXJ6-MIE KHX2666C16S4/16G 32GBKingstonBench 58%, 5 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $31

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16