Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 189 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 443 46% 371 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K610M 780 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 1909) 1GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1758 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	4.08% Terrible	Lighting 4.83 Reflection 4.38 Parallax 4.62 4% 4.61 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.08% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 3,975 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM01.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 42 54 51 51 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 409 Write 63.6 Mixed 91.5 SusWrite 46.2 33% 153 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 17.2 4K Mixed 5.5 50% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 46.1 DQ Mixed 3.6 23% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB 26,681 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	52.2% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 15.3 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2100MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,539 samples	154x
Quadro K1100MNvidiaBench 5%, 5,195 samples	117x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	106x

SSD
MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 3,736 samples	17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	12x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	41x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	20x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	15x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $150

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16