Asus H87-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H87-PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '19 at 12:52
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 219
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 409
54% 406 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 407 423 421 420 385 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 424
Mixed 369
SusWrite 412
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 61.4
201% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 44.8
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 341
220% 244 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
59GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 98 100 96 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 175
Write 116
Mixed 124
SusWrite 98.5
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 26.1
120% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 86.4
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 67.8
59% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
681GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 156 158 158 160 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 111
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 158
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87-PRO Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback