Intel NUC7i7BNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemIntel NUC7i7BNH
MotherboardIntel NUC7i7BNB  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181222
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 06 '19 at 12:25
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7567U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 202
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 323
45% 332 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6194
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 7.73
Parallax 10.2
0% 6.03 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 18.1
12% 14 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2240G 240GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 301 123 230 281 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 321
Mixed 293
SusWrite 235
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 37.2
151% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 155
160% 259 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 97%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$80
125GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 67.9
Mixed 52
SusWrite 67.5
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSH64V1H 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 46.8
MC Mixed 23.7
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7i7BNB Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i7BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback