Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 16:23
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 85.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 261
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 978
88% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,349
84% 1,349 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.3% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 92.2
Parallax 177
87% 125 fps
MRender 89.6
Gravity 117
Splatting 130
94% 112 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
550GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1543 1242 1255 1278 1275 1284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,550
Write 2261
Mixed 1,594
SusWrite 1,313
432% 1,930 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 92.8
299% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,156
DQ Write 1,034
DQ Mixed 1,066
807% 1,085 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 324%
Great: 372%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 108
Write 103
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 102
125% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.6
319% 3.33 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 0.5
375% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
11GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 18 21 22 20 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 21.4
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 18.2
30% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
55% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 37.8
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 33
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 109%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback