Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '19 at 13:20
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 78.1 1-Core 107 2-Core 214 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 817 74% 622 Pts	64-Core 1,172 73% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.9% Below average	Lighting 45.5 Reflection 43.4 Parallax 38.5 37% 42.5 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 35 31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1200 633 626 627 625 625 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1,903 Write 1,705 Mixed 786 SusWrite 722 285% 1,279 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 80.1 4K Mixed 49 167% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 279 208% 276 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 254%
TOSHIBA HDWE150 5TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 168 Write 170 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 0.6 121% 100 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 175% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 80%
ST4000VN 008-2DR166 4TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 971GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 170 180 180 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 204 Write 181 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 176 211% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 74%
ST4000VN 008-2DR166 4TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 823GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 6.4 1 0.8 0.5 0.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 193 Write 166 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 1.7 131% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 74%
ST4000VN 008-2DR166 4TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 845GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 180 170 180 180 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 189 Write 158 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 177 198% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$110 34,441 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	98% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 34.8 MC Mixed 33.6 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 37.5 SC Mixed 28.9 85% 29.8 GB/s	Latency 84.2 48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)