Acer Aspire E1-571

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-571  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_CR
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121116
Uptime13.6 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 09:49
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 123
56% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 160
22% 160 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.05 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.35
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 86 136 105 127 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 352
Write 370
Mixed 314
SusWrite 129
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 24.8
82% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 140
127% 195 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79
550GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 64 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 62.2
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 64
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8A-PB HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-571 Builds (Compare 684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback