Fujitsu D3433-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemFujitsu D3433-S1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3433-S1
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180719
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '19 at 21:47
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100TE
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 153
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 232
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.7% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 35.5
31% 37.2 fps
MRender 47.7
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 38.2
32% 40 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF256GMCS 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FSTAN103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 385 425 423 413 419 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 368
Write 342
Mixed 356
SusWrite 405
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 36.4
109% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 331
249% 334 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 81%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 117 127 125 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.3% Very good
Read 143
Write 120
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 123
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 69%
USB DISK 2.0 64GB
47GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 16.4
Mixed 4.5
9% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown i-DIMM 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D3433-S1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu D3433-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback