Asus B85M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '19 at 23:21
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 86
2-Core 176
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 348
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3734) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.9% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 70.8
Parallax 61.1
56% 66.8 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 64.5
Splatting 63.9
53% 64.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST1000DM003-1SB10C 128GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6KB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 141 137 101 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 408
Write 153
Mixed 199
SusWrite 134
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 35.6
129% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 149
124% 181 MB/s
Transcend TS128GSSD370S 1TB
86GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 104 122 142 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 147
Write 145
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 117
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
3% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
E30228A 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-K Builds (Compare 231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback