Asus G75VW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G75VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G75VW
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '19 at 22:05
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 174
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 434
50% 388 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670M
Asus(1043 2119) 3GB
CLim: 620 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 11.5
11% 13.3 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 13
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT63L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 94 89 55 52 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 461
Write 135
Mixed 163
SusWrite 71.1
45% 207 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 18.9
79% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 41.4
DQ Mixed 57.9
55% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 HMT451S6MFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback