Medion H67H2-EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMedion H67H2-EM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H67H2-EM
Memory13.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120208
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 03 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$172
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 177
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 440
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 112
Parallax 92
83% 102 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 89.7
Splatting 97.3
77% 94 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 199 105 106 101 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 473
Write 413
Mixed 383
SusWrite 159
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 41.9
135% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
192GB free
Firmware: CC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 96.8
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 102
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 69%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 5TB
363GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 100 98 102 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 68.8
Write 56.5
Mixed 22
SusWrite 99.6
83% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
166% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG KHX1600C10D3/8GX Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67H2-EM Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Medion H67H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback