Gigabyte GA-EP45T-DS3R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP45T-DS3R  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090903
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 15 '16 at 09:58
Run Duration7503 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 40.7
2-Core 81.3
45% 67 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 162
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0106
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 33.2
Mixed 32.6
25% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.55
121% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 19%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
136GB free
Firmware: 0106
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 33.2
Mixed 33.5
26% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.35
92% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.01 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 59
Mixed 52.3
43% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.3
67% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34%
Great: 34%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
110GB free
Firmware: CA14 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 72.7
Write 74
Mixed 70.7
55% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.46
104% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 61%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
75GB free
Firmware: 03.03V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 86.2
Write 101
Mixed 75.9
66% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.55
4K Mixed 0.51
142% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3300622A 300GB
11GB free
Firmware: 3.AAH Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 62.8
Write 51.9
Mixed 41.4
39% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.27
70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 37%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
2GB free
Firmware: CA12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 79.6
Write 90.2
Mixed 88.1
65% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.32
77% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 61%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
1GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 54.6
Write 54.5
Mixed 46.2
39% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.24
56% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 51%
MICRONET FANTOM DRIVE 1TB
9GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 30.8
Mixed 31.8
41% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.32
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 23%
WDC WD10 EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
2GB free, PID b159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 29.5
Mixed 29.2
38% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.26
63% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EP45T-DS3R Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45T-DS3R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $498
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback