PC Pulsar Elite

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC Pulsar Elite  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190104
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 03 '19 at 02:43
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 743
78% 624 Pts
64-Core 739
46% 739 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2299 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.8% Below average
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 73
Parallax 55.7
21% 51.4 fps
MRender 81.7
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 73.4
62% 76.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 130 129 102 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 168
Write 156
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 125
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 113%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
114GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 95 95 101 94 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 118
Write 92.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 98.4
117% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
163% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 57%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 3.7 6.1 5.5 5.6 5.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.5
Write 17.8
SusWrite 6.1
18% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.7
154% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C15K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3001 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 27.8
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 30.2
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 98%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pulsar Elite Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: PC Pulsar Elite

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $385
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback