Asus M4A785TD-V EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A785TD-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '19 at 02:07
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 85.6
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 91.6
50% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 187
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.8 7 6.7 6.6 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 30
Write 9
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 5.3
11% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 5.2
964% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 43%
Virtual Disk 1TB
258GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.4 7.5 8.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 73.3
Write 10
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 7.5
20% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.9
462% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A785TD-V EVO Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785TD-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback