MSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A21
MotherboardMSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)  (all builds)
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '16 at 02:10
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 134
2-Core 255
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 532
61% 475 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.9% Good
Lighting 87.3
Reflection 78.7
Parallax 75.5
71% 80.5 fps
MRender 81.2
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 67.6
59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 2,044
Write 905
Mixed 1,162
301% 1,370 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 39.1
214% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 188
184% 301 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 216%
Great: 243%
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
58GB free
Firmware: 1.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 499
Write 211
Mixed 287
73% 332 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 33.3
130% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 72.8
90% 157 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
134GB free
Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 116
Write 138
Mixed 98.5
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.29
77% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
46GB free
Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 118
Write 137
Mixed 116
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 0.23
76% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 114%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
453GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 89.4
Write 104
Mixed 75.4
116% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.25
85% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3500 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 56.3
MC Mixed 41.3
127% 44.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 22.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21) Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback