Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '19 at 17:30
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 20.3
2-Core 58.5
26% 40.9 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 287
29% 235 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 9.85
Parallax 6.34
6% 7.77 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 14.6
8% 8.62 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 302 289 274 296 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 372
Write 336
Mixed 210
SusWrite 286
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 14.5
51% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 111
102% 154 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
667GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 162 161 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 154
Mixed 102
SusWrite 161
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax GLJG42F-18KCGA------ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 9.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback