Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100825
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '19 at 16:41
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 74 2-Core 141 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 293 39% 293 Pts	64-Core 291 18% 291 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C97) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Lighting 35.1 Reflection 26 Parallax 32.4 29% 31.2 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 33.2 Splatting 33.1 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 569GB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 116 113 117 120 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 135 Write 125 Mixed 30 SusWrite 115 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS72101 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 171GB free, PID 1013 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 107 116 117 116 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 89.2 Write 85 Mixed 50 SusWrite 111 114% 83.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 47%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 320GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 197GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 29 29 29 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.2% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 28.7 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 28.4 38% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 11.6 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 61.1 65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H57M-USB3 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	13x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	10x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	8x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	5x
R7 260XAMD $120Bench 20%, 38,521 samples	4x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	21x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	9x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16