Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '19 at 03:38
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 415
55% 412 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 32
Parallax 58.6
36% 44.9 fps
MRender 30.5
Gravity 43
Splatting 39.8
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 341
Write 240
Mixed 272
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 30.4
120% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 146
138% 211 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 97%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
23GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14.8
Write 64
Mixed 11.2
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 82%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
439GB free
Firmware: MKAOAAM0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94
Write 90.2
Mixed 56
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 87%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
17GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 48.2
Write 69
Mixed 60.8
45% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
226GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 97 93 93 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 84.2
Write 80.2
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 93.6
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
104GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 76 71 73 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 74
Write 73.2
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 73.3
48% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
3GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 30 28 26 23 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 34.3
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 27.1
20% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 15%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-023.A00LF Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 9905584-023.A00LF Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.5% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback