Asrock Z68 Pro3 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Pro3 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 13 '16 at 12:09
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 399
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2311.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.3% Good
Lighting 79.5
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 108
65% 81.2 fps
MRender 57.5
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 73.3
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 480GB-$129
353GB free
Firmware: O1230C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 350
Write 192
Mixed 182
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 9.03
67% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 57.3
DQ Mixed 8.79
16% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 95%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 354
Write 305
Mixed 222
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 11.7
61% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 35.5
DQ Mixed 11
13% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-1600C9-4GAB 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Pro3 Gen3 Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Pro3 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback