Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8160M 18 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 192 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 656 60% 502 Pts	64-Core 2,582 160% 2,582 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 82%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung MZHPV512HDGL-000H1 512GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW24H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 982 1114 1294 1472 1485 1482 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 102%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 32GB 866 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 0GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 136 Write 21.7 Mixed 41.2 63% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.9 137% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK Samsung M393A4K40BB2-CTD HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK Samsung M393A4K40BB2-CTD HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK Samsung M393A4K40BB2-CTD H... 511GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 161% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	MC Read 79.5 MC Write 69.4 MC Mixed 68.3 207% 72.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 8.7 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 199%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 78%

Battleship

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41141stBench 63%, 670 samples	61x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 61341stBench 78%, 153 samples	55x
Xeon Silver 4108IntelBench 60%, 331 samples	31x

GPU
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	102x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	73x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	70x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	49x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 250%, 4,056 samples	40x
MZVLB1T0HALR-000H2 1TBSamsungBench 267%, 633 samples	33x

RAM
HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 12x8GBHynixBench 112%, 37 samples	21x
HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK 4x31.8GBHynixBench 92%, 67 samples	18x
M393A2K40CB2-CTD 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 161 samples	17x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16