Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 66.3 1-Core 91.4 2-Core 182 64% 113 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 708 64% 536 Pts	64-Core 1,362 84% 1,362 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 30.6 32% 33.1 fps	MRender 39.5 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 36.7 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 151GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1234 365 303 303 303 302 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	222% Outstanding	Read 1,474 Write 1,266 Mixed 1,120 SusWrite 468 242% 1,082 MB/s	4K Read 63.3 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 82.2 280% 98.1 MB/s	DQ Read 980 DQ Write 1,173 DQ Mixed 1,014 782% 1,056 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 222% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 387GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1264 1266 1265 1140 1058 1068 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 1,494 Write 1,273 Mixed 1,235 SusWrite 1,177 291% 1,295 MB/s	4K Read 63.9 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 86.4 294% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 1,440 DQ Write 1,197 DQ Mixed 1,284 971% 1,307 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 372%
RAID1 1.5TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 517 513 510 513 514 513 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 563 Write 498 Mixed 503 SusWrite 513 117% 519 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 37.9 123% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 354 266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 2C... 130GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 19.7 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 6.5 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	320x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x