Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '19 at 08:41
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 86.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 669
73% 579 Pts
64-Core 673
42% 673 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 12% Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 116 75 74 73 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 442
Write 375
Mixed 290
SusWrite 106
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 10.1
91% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 83.8
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 18.3
52% 107 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 88%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
181GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1358 313 313 312 312 313 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,394
Write 1,462
Mixed 1,339
SusWrite 487
315% 1,420 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 74.6
254% 89.8 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 1,016
DQ Mixed 994
746% 992 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 248%
Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
536GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 167 168 165 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 159
Mixed 110
SusWrite 166
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
247% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 31.8
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 27.5
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback