Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '19 at 07:34
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$201 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 94.2 2-Core 183 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 458 47% 379 Pts	64-Core 461 28% 461 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.1% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 36.4 Parallax 51.3 31% 42.1 fps	MRender 49.5 Gravity 43.4 Splatting 33.7 34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120 11,799 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 211 215 214 196 213 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.4% Average	Read 198 Write 206 Mixed 169 SusWrite 197 44% 193 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 25.8 83% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 14.9 DQ Write 84.7 DQ Mixed 27.9 28% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 101%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 782GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 118 118 118 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 120 Write 144 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 118 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.3 243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 3TB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 25.8 Write 19.7 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 25.5 17% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 105%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 369GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 25.7 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 3.4 25% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.6 171% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 84%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 764GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 30 Write 25 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 0.1 25% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 58%
ST4000DM 001-1FK17N 4TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	26% Poor	Read 24.8 Write 25.3 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 24.8 35% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.7 213% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 75%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 543GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 24.8 Write 21.2 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 0.1 23% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.5 148% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 3x4GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.9% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 9.4 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $201Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	51x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	46x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	42x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	24x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	5x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $239

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16