Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4870HQ 3,774 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	32.7% Below average	Memory 53.3 1-Core 21.7 2-Core 37.2 27% 37.4 Pts	4-Core 67.4 8-Core 116 11% 91.6 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 76%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV512HDGL-000H1 512GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 459GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW24H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 462 494 479 467 459 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 589 Write 536 Mixed 481 SusWrite 473 117% 520 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 27.8 100% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 177 134% 179 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GB 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 15 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 6 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-4870HQIntelBench 66%, 3,774 samples	9x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro K1100MNvidiaBench 5%, 5,195 samples	6x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	5x
Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)IntelBench 6%, 5,483 samples	5x

SSD
XP941 PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 128%, 1,482 samples	4x
L8H-256V2G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 74%, 4,213 samples	3x
Basics 256GBValuetechBench 65%, 350 samples	2x

RAM
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 51%, 8,416 samples	8x
HMT41GS6MFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 450 samples	4x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16