Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '16 at 21:16
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 218
84% 144 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 599
63% 502 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F6) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 47.9
34% 42.3 fps
MRender 48
Gravity 35.3
Splatting 34.7
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 240GB-$65
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 332ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66% Good
Read 506
Write 191
Mixed 265
70% 321 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 11.7
80% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 76.3
104% 192 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66%
Great: 92%
WD My Book 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0171 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
45% Average
Read 79.5
Write 76.9
Mixed 23.5
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.35
103% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45%
Great: 65%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
910GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 192
Mixed 183
145% 192 MB/s
4K Read 1.61
4K Write 3.93
4K Mixed 0.39
183% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 113%
Great: 117%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
431GB free
Firmware: D005DEM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 66
Mixed 56.5
48% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.29
67% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
235GB free
Firmware: 3.CHL Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 68.4
Write 68.5
Mixed 69
52% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.29
88% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 19.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,003
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback