Dell Precision T5600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T5600
MotherboardDell Precision T5600  (all builds)
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140511
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '19 at 09:12
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 182
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 711
64% 539 Pts
64-Core 1,800
111% 1,800 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Zotac(19DA 1511) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 132
Parallax 136
119% 138 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 135
Splatting 106
111% 141 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1726
Write 1255
Mixed 1,273
315% 1,418 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 44.9
158% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 543
395% 518 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 228%
Asmt106x- V0Fast 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: 1409
SusWrite @10s intervals: 505 259 153 165 160 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 607
Write 391
Mixed 329
SusWrite 235
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 17
65% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 85.6
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 49.2
50% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 60%
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: DXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 271
Write 254
Mixed 142
SusWrite 79
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 18.8
68% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 68
DQ Mixed 24.1
24% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
612GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 165 169 165 168 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 116
Write 111
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 167
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 107%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 180
Write 172
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 79.1
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
398% 3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 104%
WD WDS120G2G0B- 120GB
86GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 81 78 81 81 81 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix-00AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 30.4
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.7
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5600 Builds (Compare 896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback