Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160913
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '19 at 05:37
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 247
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 833
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,003
62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2527 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 32.5
0% 14.5 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 119
Splatting 4.87
33% 43.6 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 382 408 400 414 304 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 462
Mixed 390
SusWrite 391
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57
195% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
22GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 141 150 150 142 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 418
Write 162
Mixed 212
SusWrite 142
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 41.8
159% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 188
143% 195 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83%
Great: 88%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
13GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 81 102 97 97 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 97
Write 101
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 93
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
910GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 185 188 189 188 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 178
Mixed 85
SusWrite 188
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 36.3
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback