Samsung R780

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Samsung R780 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG R780
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100705
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '19 at 16:49
Run Duration	317 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 640 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38% Below average	Memory 51.2 1-Core 48 2-Core 89.8 38% 63 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 149 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C06A) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.58% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 1 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 3.65 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.58% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 756GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 223 334 147 230 236 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 77% Great: 124%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 885GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 18 28 17 21 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 77 Write 97.7 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 21.7 45% 61 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.2 114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 68%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 246GB 381 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 216GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.5 13 8.6 8.7 7.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 29 Write 18.3 Mixed 19 SusWrite 9.5 24% 19 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 97% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 36%
Single Flash Reader 256GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 197GB free, PID 6335 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 7.4 12 6.9 10 8.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.25% Terrible	Read 16.8 Write 13 Mixed 14.1 SusWrite 8.9 17% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 19% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 5.25% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB 11,714 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	21% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 9.8 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical R780 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung R780

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	7x
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	5x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	25x
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	8x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
Green 2.5 1000GBWDBench 49%, 1,512 samples	3x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	8x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	4x
M471B5773CHS-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 26%, 995 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $265

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16