bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180115
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '19 at 21:59
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 46.7
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 162
51% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 151
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37%
Great: 51%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 268GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 131 132 133 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 365
Write 174
Mixed 318
SusWrite 134
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 6.5
29% 8.6 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 128
94% 125 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 64 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 34.6
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback