Asus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552VW
Memory21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '19 at 18:13
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 180
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 316
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 239 168 129 177 233 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 451
Mixed 403
SusWrite 222
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 45.4
149% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 303
227% 303 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 126%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
61GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 75 74 76 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 127
Write 122
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 74.3
63% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 23.7
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 22.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552VW Builds (Compare 2,482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP - $1,049

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,049
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback