Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '19 at 12:32
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 113
2-Core 228
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 584
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Lighting 61.1
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 82.3
50% 71.9 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 57.5
51% 63 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 Pro. 256GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYRA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 64 64 67 74 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 105%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
96GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 319 305 293 294 289 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 471
Mixed 469
SusWrite 314
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 60.5
202% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
74GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 146 146 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 490
Mixed 392
SusWrite 178
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 57.3
205% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 355
269% 362 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 110%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
771GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 194 202 195 200 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 130
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 195
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB M378B5173CB0-CK0 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.4% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback